Competitive Analysis: a Tokeny case study
Collect competitor product features, pricing, and user reviews to generate structured comparison analyses. Follow the recorded task, execution screenshots, actual files and verification notes.
By the Tokeny team · Windows · Tokeny 1.7.8 · gpt-6-sol
Prepare the inputs
Create a separate workspace in Tokeny, download and unpack the sample inputs, then select a model that supports tools. The sample uses synthetic data or the public sources named in the article.
- sources.txt
Send the task to Tokeny
The original task was executed in Chinese. Copying these instructions reproduces the same task; the results below include an English report.
比较 Trello 与 Asana 的任务协作定位、公开功能和价格说明；实际读取官方页面，定价读取失败时标为待核实，不编造用户评价。 交付文件：comparison.md、comparison.csv。 验收要点： - 每个产品有官方来源 - 区分公开定价和无法核实的信息 - 避免断言哪个产品普遍更好 这是使用合成演示输入或指定公开资料的真实操作案例。请先读取工作空间输入，再实际生成文件并自检。所有写入、脚本与临时服务限于当前工作空间；临时服务只监听 127.0.0.1，执行后关闭；不触达外部收件人、不发布、不付款、不更改系统设置，不调用子智能体。需要公开资料时可读取给定 URL。只启用完成任务必需的工具。另写 report.md（中文）和 report.en.md（英文），简洁、完整，包含输入、处理步骤、真实结果、检查方式和局限；失败或未验证部分如实记录，不能宣称成功。最终回复用中文列出产物、关键结果与待核实项。
The recorded run used an isolated demonstration workspace. Review the commands and file paths before approving operations in your own workspace.
What actually ran
The task was submitted through the Tokeny input box. An online model read the inputs and executed tools. Public sources are listed in the report, along with retrieval failures, missing information and scope.
Results and verification
Input
I read the workspace input file sources.txt. It contained two non-empty official URLs:
The third line was empty. Environment details came from ENVIRONMENT.md: Windows and Tokeny 1.7.8. No temporary service, external recipient, payment, system-setting change, or sub-agent was used.
Processing Steps
- Read
sources.txt,ENVIRONMENT.md, and.tokeny/manifest.json. - Fetched the Trello and Asana pricing pages listed in
sources.txt. - Fetched Trello's official guide and features page, plus Asana's official features and help pages, to supplement public positioning and feature information.
- Used only official page content. No user reviews were added, and the report does not claim that either product is universally better.
- Wrote
comparison.mdandcomparison.csv, and recorded results and limitations here.
Actual Results
- Trello's pricing page returned public prices for Free, Standard, Premium, and Enterprise.
- Asana's pricing page returned public prices for Personal, Starter, and Advanced. Enterprise is listed as contact sales, so a fixed amount could not be verified and is marked as pending verification.
- Trello's official features page reported that resources did not fully load in this fetch. Trello feature notes therefore rely mainly on the official pricing page and official guide.
- Asana's help page returned only “Loading” in this fetch and was not used as verified evidence.
- The output files include source URLs, the retrieval date (2026-11-07, Asia/Shanghai), billing conditions, verified items, and pending items.
Checks Performed
- Re-read
comparison.mdandcomparison.csvto confirm that both products have official sources. - Checked that the price tables include plan, amount, billing condition, and verification status.
- Checked that Asana Enterprise's fixed price is explicitly marked as pending verification, together with taxes, regional variation, discounts, seat rules, and add-on boundaries.
- Checked that the files contain no third-party user reviews and no universal product-ranking claim.
Limitations
Pricing and feature pages can change by region, login state, billing cycle, and date. “Contact sales” is not a verifiable fixed quote; final pricing, taxes, discounts, regional applicability, and add-on charges still require confirmation from the vendor or checkout flow. Trello Features and Asana Help did not provide complete content in this fetch, so they were not treated as fully verified evidence.
Download and inspect the outputs
The archive contains the files created during this run. Use these checks when adapting the example to your own data.
- Reconcile the reported results against the downloadable sample inputs.
- Open the generated files and check the contents relevant to your task.
- Review the limitations and any unverified steps in the report.